Log in

Statement on the Government’s Higher Education Green Paper

Students' Union logo

On 6th November the Government released a policy document which proposes some important changes to Higher Education (HE) in England. Members of the Students’ Union’s Executive Committee believe the document, known as the HE Green Paper, could lead to several important and worrying changes to the way universities are run.

The policies outlined in the paper suggest that over the next few years we will see rapid marketisation of our education system. Marketisation will see the public education system behave like the private business sector.

The Students’ Union Executive Committee, comprised of all ten Elected Officers, believe that education is a public good that should not be profited from.

The HE green paper is heavily focused on full-time students coming straight out of full-time school or college education and into Higher Education. We are extremely concerned that there is very little mention of part-time or mature students - groups which are extremely important parts of the Sussex community. This omission is exacerbated by the national picture, which shows a sharp decrease in part-time and mature students, who we feel are failing to be supported. The green paper uses the phrase ’what employers want’ 35 times, revealing that whilst the paper claims to be focused on improving quality for students it appears to actually be most concerned with employers.

Similarly, we have concerns that the paper primarily focuses on degree outcomes and graduate employment after six months, rather than how enriching the university experience is and how supported students feel whilst at university. The focus on graduate employment worries us, as this data is collected only six months after students have graduated. We know that due to the current employment market, it can be difficult to be in a graduate level job six months after graduation. We are also aware that some students prefer to take time for reflection immediately after graduating and should not be penalised for this.

Similarly, the focus on the salaries of graduates will impact those students who want to work in the charity, third sector or public sector profession, which may incorrectly be viewed as being of a lower status as they are generally paid less than other roles. We openly challenge this ranking of professions and are aware that this statistically impacts women to a greater extent.

Some key areas of the paper which the Students’ Union Executive Committee strongly oppose include:

  • The Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) - This will allow Universities to raise their tuition fees by inflation if they can demonstrate “excellent teaching”. This is a vague and subjective term but is likely to be measured by NSS scores and graduate employment data, which we believe can be too easily manipulated by universities to bump themselves up in league tables.

    As stated in the ‘Education is not for Sale’ policy voted for by students, the Students’ Union believes in ‘free, popular, democratic and publicly funded education’. The Full Time and Part Time Officers are therefore wholeheartedly against the TEF and the notion that students should be expected to pay more money for ‘quality teaching’, which will be poorly and inaccurately measured. This could create a two-tier system with the higher ranking, and more expensive, universities being seen as ‘trusted providers’ by employers. This could mean that degrees from universities with lower tuition fees could be seen as less valuable by employers.

  • Exemption from Freedom Of Information (FOI) requests - The paper has put forward plans for publicly funded institutions to be exempt from requests under the Freedom of Information Act due to the fact that these can cost universities around £10m per year. The government feel there is a need to create a ‘level playing field’ with private providers, who are not subject to these requests.

    However, we have concerns as FOI requests are an invaluable mechanism for holding universities to account and scrutinising spending decisions. Student media organisations and individual students have used FOI requests appropriately in the past to challenge decisions which have been made at the University of Sussex.

  • Students’ Unions -  The government wants to increase the accountability and  transparency of Students’ Unions, which in principle sounds like a good thing. However, this is linked to government reforms designed to restrict trade unions. This is therefore a clear attack on the autonomy and influence of Students’ Unions.

  • Private providers - The proposals could make it easier for private providers to enter the Higher Education (HE) ‘market’; they could obtain degree awarding powers within four years and university status in less than five. This means that private providers potentially wanting to make a profit will be given public money to run as a HE institution. The quality and importance of current universities could also be undermined as there will be less scrutiny on institutions entering the HE ‘market’. The Students’ Union does not believe that private companies should financially profit from education.

The Higher Education green paper clearly emphasises education as a privilege that only some can afford and sees a move away from true quality education and teaching, as universities will be forced to focus on potentially manipulated statistics and outcomes, rather than actual valuable student experience.

The Students’ Union Officers will work with students to challenge these changes as we believe that education should be a public good that everyone has equal access to.

We will be sending out information soon about how all Sussex students can contribute to the Union’s response to the Green Paper.

We also want to hear from students who are wanting to mobilise around these issues. Please contact ugeducation@sussexstudent.com or pgeducation@sussexstudent.com.


Contact us

Got a comment/criticism about anything discussed in this article? Let us know on our social media channels!



Related news

Find out who is running in the Spring Elections

Mon 25 Feb 2019

Elected officers and representatives are elected by you to work within the University and Students' Union to make things better for Sussex students. This could be as part of formal committees, through informal meetings, working on relevant projects and campaigns, and working closely with other officers, members of staff and students.

Sussex students represented at NUS Trans Students’ Conference 2019

Thu 14 Feb 2019

Ray Everall, Liam Dewan, Dorian Milburn and Nate Tomkings recently represented Sussex University students as delegates at the NUS Trans Conference 2019, which took place from 30 - 31 January in Manchester.

The Loop: responding to your feedback

Fri 08 Feb 2019

The Loop

Each month your full-time officers get together to look at what comments you have submitted to the Loop over the past month. These are categorised into what is going well, what is going less well, and ideas for improvement. This feedback is acted upon: specific comments are sent to the University to inform their service and to take action if necessary.

Winter Officer Reports

Thu 07 Feb 2019

Your elected Officers have been building on their work from last term, progressing their priorities and manifesto points. Here’s a summary of what each Officer has been up to!

Nominations for spring elected positions are now open!

Fri 14 Dec 2018

Nominate yourself for Full and Part-Time Officer roles, NUS Delegate and Student Trustee positions until 9am on the 11th of February!


This list is automatically generated

View all news »